The Product
With the ever emerging popularity of FireWire for the PC, several
companies have designed their own solutions for the technology. I
have reviewed several new products on the market that are FireWire
compatible, including Belkin's FireWire adapter card, Maxtor's 80GB
FireWire external storage, and the QPS Que!Fire 10X12X32 FireWire.
Well, Adaptec has joined this increasing list of companies developing
FireWire products. Their new FireConnect 4300 is a PCI adapter card
for your computer. It features three isochronous ports delivering
300Mb/sec or for easier reference about 50MB/sec. The FireConnect
4300 also features the inclusion of MGI Videowave 4 DV editing software
for all those video editing folks out there.
Testing
System Specs
PIII 1Ghz
128MB PC133 SDRAM
Maxtor 60GB Hard Drive
Belkin PCI FireWire Card
Adaptec FireConnect 4300
Hercules Game Theater XP
Visiontek Geforce2 Ultra
3COM 3C905 10/100 NIC
Belkin Phoneline 10X PCI Adapter
For a comparison, I thought I would match the FireConnect 4300 up
against the Belkin FireWire PCI card that I reviewed last month
and see if there was any difference between the two since they have
different controller chips. The Belkin FireWire card has a controller
manufactured by Lucent and the Adaptec's is manufactured by Texas
Instruments..
Unfortunately I was unable to locate a device or test that would
utilize the full bandwidth of the FireWire bus. I did, however,
run tests to determine the consistency in bandwidth between both
cards. To do this I used the Maxtor 80GB FireWire External Storage.
I used Winbench 99's Disk Transfer Rate test to determine if there
were any fluctuations in bandwidth consistency between the two FireWire
cards when conducting transfers on the Maxtor FireWire drive. I
also conducted six runs on each card of Sisoft Sandra's hard drive
benchmarking tool and then averaged the results.
Here are the results:
Winbench 99 DTR Comparison

(FireConnect 4300)

(Belkin FireWire Card)
Winbench 99

Sisoft Sandra
Adaptec Average - 14028.83333
Belkin Average - 14036.33333
Starting with the Winbench DTR comparison, it can be seen that
the sustained transfer rates between the two are almost identical.
There is only a very small discrepancy between them, not enough
in my opinion to deem one better than the other.
In the Winbench disk playback results it can be seen that there
is no consistent winner here either. The results fluctuate back
and forth between the two with one adapter winning by only a very
small amount.
The Sisoft Sandra results fluctuated each time I ran them, that
is why I decided to take the average of six consecutive tests performed
on each card. The results again show a very close tie between the
two.
I also conducted some real-world transfer tests on the two cards.
On both adapters, an 89.7MB file structure moved in exactly 8 secs.
Overall, I am unable to determine a real winner between the two.
In some tests the Adaptec wins, in others it is the Belkin. In real
world testing, however, they were exactly the same.
The only real difference between the two cards that I found has
nothing to do with performance but with features and software. Belkin's
FireWire card ships with a power supply connection built onto the
FireWire card. This allows for connection to your power supply in
order to provide an extra boost of power for devices if required.
However, the chance that you would actually need that much power
is probably very slim unless you plan on connecting a lot of power
hungry devices to your FireWire card. It is just an extra added
safety net for the consumer. On the other hand, if you are purchasing
a FireWire card for image and video editing, the Adaptec card comes
with MGI VideoWave 4, the latest version available from MGI. Belkin's
card, however, only ships with version 3.
|